Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Curtis was not a Justice. He resigned in 1857.

How does that discredit the opinion of a former US Supreme Court justice?

It doesn't, necessarily.

It discredits -you- for calling him a Justice.

Walt

1,329 posted on 12/03/2002 4:30:54 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1321 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
It discredits -you- for calling him a Justice.

ROTFL! Has it come to this? Denigrating a position because of a title? In case you are not aware of customs of the several (meaning more than one entity) united (as in joined for common purposes) states (again, multiple distinct entities), it is proper to address local, state and federal officials by the title of the highest office they held.

Curtis liked the President - admired him greatly, even believed that the war was was fought for just cause. But he believed that Lincoln usurped powers and his Emancipation Proclomation was null and void.

1,332 posted on 12/03/2002 5:52:46 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson