Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
I disagreed with the whole idea of some putative "Common Ancestor," as understood in the Darwinian doctrinal framework. Other than that, I have no problem with evolution at all.

You intrigue me, BB. Evolution implies that all life on Earth is related. The implication of common ancestry for any two species (if we go back far enough) seems to be an inevitable conclusion. How could there be a species with no roots at all in the great assembly of life on Earth?

356 posted on 10/13/2002 12:49:47 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
The implication of common ancestry for any two species

No, it is not. Cows bear cows, dogs bear dogs, humans bear humans. We see this every day. We do not see, have never seen a species transform itself into another.

414 posted on 10/14/2002 4:56:49 AM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson