[gore3000]

However life got sparked - whether or not by divine intervention - evolution has evidently followed.

Evolution is a materialistic explanation of life. It supposes some very unlikely things to occur in order for it to have brought about the numerous transformations from bacteria to humans. If there is any sort of an intelligent designer that created life, the more reasonable explanation is that these transformations were achieved by the intelligent designer who created life.

In fact, the evolutionist explanations of how life transforms itself from one lower species to a higher one have been constantly disproven by science. Essentially evolution is always trying to 'catch up' with science in order to 'explain away' the objections presented by new scientific discoveries. It thus keeps constructing more and more unlikely explanations for how evolution could have occurred.

[AntiGuv]

Heliocentric cosmology is a materialistic explanation of the universe. It supposes some very unlikely things to occur in order for it to havebrought about the numerous transformations from interstellar dust to planetary ecology. If there is any sort of an intelligent designer that created the universe, the more reasonable explanation is that these transformations were achieved by the intelligent designer who created the universe.

(The next sentence is meaningless because had any such thing been disproven then the evolutionary model would've been discarded already.) Regardless, astronomy is similarly always trying to 'catch up' with science in order to 'explain away' the objections presented by new scientific discoveries. That happens to be the sort of thing which scientists do regardless of whatever the Flat Earth society wishes to believe.