Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Davis, on the other hand, never once won an election where he had an opponent. Not for congress, not senate, not president of the confederacy.

That is interesting. I believe that Lincoln actually lost more elections than he won. But consider:

"But there were limits to what Lincoln would do to secure a second term.

He did not even consider canceling or postponing the election. Even had that been constitutionally possible, "the election was a necessity." "We can not have free government without elections," he explained; "and if the rebellion could force us to forego, or postpone a national election, it might fairly claim to have already conquered and ruined us." He did not postpone the September draft call, even though Republican politicians from all across the North entreated him to do so. Because Indiana failed to permit its soldiers to vote in the field, he was entirely willing to furlough Sherman's regiments so that they could go home and vote in the October state elections -but he made a point of telling Sherman, "They need not remain for the Presidential election, but may return to you at once."

Though it was clear that the election was going to be a very close one, Lincoln did not try to increase the Republican electoral vote by rushing the admission of new states like Colorado and Nebraska, both of which would surely have voted for his reelection. On October 31, in accordance with an act of Congress, he did proclaim Nevada a state, but he showed little interest in the legislation admitting the new state. Despite the suspicion of both Democrats and Radicals, he made no effort to force the readmission of Louisiana, Tennessee, and other Southern states, partially reconstructed but still under military control, so that they could cast their electoral votes for him. He reminded a delegation from Tennessee that it was the Congress, not the Chief Executive, that had the power to decide whether a state's electoral votes were to be counted and announced firmly, “Except it be to give protection against violence, I decline to interfere in any way with the presidential election.”

"Lincoln", pp. 539-40 by David H. Donald

Don't forget though:

Lincoln opposed slavery, so he is attacked. Davis favored slavery, so he gets a free pass.

Walt

23 posted on 10/09/2002 8:12:35 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Lincoln could not have given a tinker's damn about slaves one way or another. He was a politician....


27 posted on 10/09/2002 8:34:25 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
I believe that Lincoln actually lost more elections than he won.

But on the other hand, Lincoln actually can say he beat people in elections. Davis can't.

29 posted on 10/09/2002 9:10:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson