[TexConfederate1861]

Another nail in the coffin of your "secession was always illegal" rant:

AB INITIO QUESTION. The ab initio question arose in the Constitutional Convention of 1866qv over the legal status of secession.qv Radical Republicans led by Morgan C. Hamiltonqv maintained that secession was null and void ab initio ("from the beginning") and that all laws and transactions based on laws passed since secession in 1861 were null and void. Moderates led by Andrew J. Hamiltonqv contended that secession was null and void as a result of the war but preferred to validate all laws not in conflict with the laws and constitution of the United States. Moderates opposed ab initio because of possible economic and political consequences. Had the radicals won, no government act in Texas between 1861 and 1866 would have been valid. The ab initio theory was rejected by Elisha M. Pease,qv by the military, by the constitutional conventions, and by the Republican state committee.

[WhiskeyPapa]

But whatever.....I will no longer cast "pearls before swine!

It took you about two hours to do exactly that.

Soooooooweeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!

Walt