Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
Wlat:

The ruling was AFTER THE FACT......secession was an accepted right among most states in 1861, even in New England.

But, everyone has told you this 10,000 times.........

Were you dropped on your head as a child, or what?
116 posted on 10/11/2002 7:54:24 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: TexConfederate1861
The ruling was AFTER THE FACT......secession was an accepted right among most states in 1861, even in New England.

All court cases come to trial after the fact. The first time the issue was presented to the Supreme Court, they ruled secession to be null and void, and the secessionists to be engaged in treason.

You can argue that the secessionists had a right to revolution, but you cannot argue that there was a basis in U.S. law, because the record simply won't support it.

Walt

118 posted on 10/11/2002 8:14:08 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson