Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DBtoo
I will try to answer my own question to my own, very limited ability, by reposting something from http://gnxp.blogspot.com/
Bottle your blondes, gentlemen..

Blondes are on their way to extinction..

A new study by German researchers claims that people with blonde hair comprise an endangered species that will become extinct by 2202.

The problem is that blonde hair -- like blue eyes -- is caused by a recessive gene. In order for a child to have blonde hair, it must have the gene for blond hair on both sides of the family in the grandparents' generation.

The decline and fall of the blonde is most likely being caused by bottle blondes who, researchers believe, are more attractive to men than true blondes.


Where is PETA when you need them the most.. and what are those good ol' blonde-loving Arab sheikhs going to do about it, I ask..? A captive blonde breeding program? An artificial insemination program..? Brave New World has nothing on real life!

Razib adds: I know about this story. I don't believe it really, but if it is true, I'll be tearing my hair out in lamentation...let's hope that transhumanism doesn't succeed and I don't see that terrible day....

Godless rolls eyes heavenward:

The authors of this article don't know the first thing about population genetics. Even if blonde hair was a phenotype that only occurred in a homozygous recessive (a big if), it's not a lethal disease. In fact, it may even convey a reproductive advantage, at least in the US. If the selection pressure against blonds was very strong (e.g. lethal), it'd take a long time for blonds to go "extinct", but in the absence of such selection pressure it's highly unlikely that blonds will disappear any time soon.

Note also that if we had random worldwide mating, then we'd eventually attain Hardy-Weinberg equlibrium, in which the frequency of a homozygous recessive selectively neutral trait is constant from generation to generation. In other words, there's a lower limit to how infrequent blonds will be as long as being blond is a neutral or slightly positive trait in terms of reproductive fitness. But we don't have random mating - we have assortative mating. Meaning that like tends to marry like. That's true for height and IQ, and it's true for race. Whites tend to marry whites, which is non-random mating, which tends to boost the frequency of the double recessives if the genes for blond hair are found exclusively in white populations. [1] Bottom line - this article is baloney.

[1] This is something of an oversimplification in the US, as southern and eastern Europeans mingle pretty freely with northern Europeans, but in the main the argument holds.


Under the Radar adds:
I think that Godless is correct, all things being equal. But all things are not equal. Humans do practice assortive mating and these non-random pairs of whites are not reproducing at replacement levels. Which will contribute to the decrease in the expression of the gene, even if there are lower limits to its infrequency. Will natural blondes die out completely? Probably not. Will they be very, very rare? I have yet to see any evidence that would show how they could not be rare.
33 posted on 10/02/2002 5:30:14 AM PDT by Under the Radar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Under the Radar
Good post!!
66 posted on 10/03/2002 1:22:52 AM PDT by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson