Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Larry Lucido
But, slavery was most definitely the impetus for secession. That, IMHO, cannot be denied. The central issue was "property rights" in other human beings, and this "right" was expressly encapsulated in the Confederacy's constitution. As much as I love the South (and Texas), I'm glad the Confederacy lost.

The central issue was not "property rights", the issue was "states' rights." Slavery was a catalyst to bring the issue to the forefront. I'm torn about whether I'm glad we lost because it set the groundwork for creation of the mammoth federal government that now exists.

83 posted on 09/26/2002 8:02:30 PM PDT by TwoBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: TwoBear
The central issue was not "property rights", the issue was "states' rights."

True, but discussions of states' rights were routinely in the context of property rights, i.e., the right to own and dispose of slave property, to transport such property in free states and territories unmolested, and to call upon the federal government to enforce such rights via the Fugitive Slave act.

Agreed about mammoth government, of course, but were the seeds really planted in the 1860's or in the 1930's?

136 posted on 09/26/2002 8:55:42 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson