Hmmm. I clicked on the "View Replies" hyperlink to your post, and it says "No Replies." Apparently no one wants to or is able to correct your assessment.
Click again. Anyone can look at that list and see that it is factually accurate. There's nothing to correct. It does not logically follow that just because someone is on the Republican ticket, they must be a good candidate, a good conservative, or a good human being. Does the name Jeffords mean anything to you? How about Snowe, Chaffee, and McCain? (Chaffee's already considered switching if it will throw the balance again. THAT'S what you'll accept from a candidate, as long as he has an "R" after his name?? Having a Senate majority is worth trashing our principles?)
A better Christian soul than most of us was banned for daring to utter common sense and Founding principles (concentration of power in any one party is a bad thing... limited federal power... "power corrupts"... don't trust a carpetbagger... vote for the person, not the party...). The fact that there is no shame in this is saddening.
The idea that a person's voting preference in one single race is worth ostracising him is anathema to everything conservatives are supposed to stand for. Has FR become so weak that support for a non-GOP candidate that is expressed in mature fashion, with supportive and logical reasoning, cannot be allowed to be uttered? The kid simply said that he wanted a Tarheel to be his representative, not an outsider, and he got BANNED from the best website on the 'net. That isn't right, and it shouldn't be representative of the Right. It stinks.