Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Start-up brings "blades" to the desktop
CNET News.com ^ | September 20, 2002, 12:42 PM PT | Michael Kanellos Staff Writer, CNET News.com

Posted on 09/22/2002 1:15:52 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Twenty-one years ago, the computer left the "glass house" for the desktop. Now a start-up appropriately named ClearCube wants to send it back.

The Austin, Texas-based company is trying to popularize a new vision for office computing where users would still have monitors, mice and keyboards on their desks, but their superthin computers would be neatly stacked in centralized computer rooms--the descendents of yesteryear's so-called glass houses.

The contemporary twist involves "blade"-style design, in which thin devices are stacked vertically in racks like books or record albums. Although the blade concept has taken the server and storage markets by storm, ClearCube's effort would be the first major attempt to bring the idea to desktop workstations.

Click Here!

"It's sort of like thin clients, but it's running all the same software as regular desktops," said Roger Kay, an analyst at market research firm IDC. "They've got some of the biggies sniffing around looking at them."

Thin client workstations aren't independent computers--the hard drives, personal data and applications are all stored on servers, and if the servers go down, the desktops become paperweights. Hence thin clients have never taken off. But blade workstations would be full-fledged PCs.

ClearCube said several large companies are considering licensing or reselling elements of its technology. "We are in discussion with large OEMs," said Raj Shah, the company's chief marketing officer. Although Shah declined to name names, Hewlett-Packard has most frequently been mentioned as a potential ally. Acquisition rumors have floated around as well. Investors include Acer, and Sternhill Partners, a venture firm that counts former chief Compaq Computer strategist Robert Stearns among its number.

Like the blade server, a blade workstation of the type ClearCube envisions has the potential to drastically cut the costs associated with maintenance. The machines can be kept in a small space, letting administrators do more work without having to leave their office and roam. That means more efficient administrators, and thus, possibly, a smaller administrative staff.

"It is much easier for me to support racked PCs," said Capt. Timothy Ohrenberger of the U.S. Air Force. "The waiting time for customer-support work orders is about 50 percent lower."

Ohrenberger oversaw a pilot program involving 44 ClearCube blades run by the medical services unit of Hill Air Force Base in Utah. He found that computer downtime dropped by 95 percent and IT staff time per PC fell 83 percent.

ClearCube says that blade desktops also improve security and overall system utilization. Even the costs associated with shuffling an employee from one desk to another are cut, because no equipment actually gets moved. In a downtown high-rise, that can mean a lot.

"These are union buildings," said ClearCube CEO Mike Frost. "You can't just up and move a box. It can cost $1,000 or more."

Despite the potential advantages of ClearCube's approach, though, the fact remains that start-ups get crushed on a regular basis in the hardware world. The company claims, however, that its patents provide some insulation from a sudden onslaught by the likes of Dell or IBM.

One business-process patent, for instance, applies to a method for managing PCs in a central rack, said Shah. Others apply to security protocols for protecting data in transit.

Privately held ClearCube won't reveal its revenue or most of its customers but said that both sales and customer test programs are growing.

Morgan Stanley, and The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) headquarters in Cheyenne Mountain, Wyo., are both experimenting with ClearCube's workstations. And a large financial services company is deploying test systems in New York, Hong Kong and London, ClearCube said. The report from Hill Air Force Base has been submitted to the Air Force Medical Support Agency, the purchasing arm for the medical unit, which will determine whether these systems can be purchased on a nationwide basis.

Latitude to longitude
Since the beginning of 2001, "blades" has been one of the major buzzwords of the computing world. Unlike regular computers, blades come with no external case. Instead, they are naked circuit boards containing processors, memory, input-output components, and, more often than not, independent hard drives.

Rather than sit on a desk or remain stacked horizontally in a rack, blades slide vertically into a specialized rack that contains all the wiring necessary to hook the computers into the network.

The architectural change brings a host of benefits, according to analysts and computer executives. The physical real estate required for computers gets greatly reduced. Computers can also be more efficiently used: an administrator can deploy a batch of blades to handle e-mail in the morning and then convert them to Web servers later. Management software and physical proximity make this possible.

Although nearly everyone has adopted the blade ethos for servers or storage systems--which are already generally kept in centralized computer rooms--some of the benefits apply to the desktop.

For one thing, desktop blades reduce walking-around time. On their desks, users get a monitor, keyboard, mouse and a C/Port, a phone-sized input-output unit for connecting the stuff together. A cable, cloaked in security protocols, connects the C/Port to the user's Pentium 4 computer in the back room. 112 computers can be squeezed onto a six-foot rack.

In the Hill trial, for example, the time required to load software dropped from 9 minutes to 3.5 minutes. With conventional desktops, each PC has to be unboxed, then taken to a computer room, then connected to an imaging station, then taken down for final testing and deployment.

In the rack, after the first software image was loaded, it could be replicated across all other desktops, said the Air Force's Ohrenberger.

Additionally, blade desktops can bring some perks that aren't practical on standard desktops. ClearCube's racks typically contain one or two spare blades. If someone's PC dies, an administrator can swap the affected employee to a spare blade.

Potentially, this could make the technology popular for retail brokerages "where you have hundreds or even thousands of desktops," said Jerry Silva, senior analyst at the Tower Group, which studies the impact of IT on the financial-services market. While exact savings are difficult to quantify, increased computer reliability does cut costs, he added.

But what about the data?
The software-management package that comes with ClearCube's blades includes an application that backs up data from one individual drive to two or three others in the same rack.

"There's tons of extra disk space everywhere," said ClearCube's Shah, who noted that very few people use up the full 20GB to 30GBs found in drives today. Secure partitions prevent employees from accessing any backup data their PC happens to host.

Blading also permits a form of mobile computing. Since the drive and other computing elements are located in a central location, users can log in to the network at any available keyboard and connect to their "desktop," said Shah. The Oklahoma Heart Hospital, among others, has experimented with putting log-in terminals in patient rooms that can be accessed by doctors or nurses with smart cards.

Bladed desktops do create security problems, but the company says it has resolved most of these and pushed forward to a point where security actually improves. The ports on the desktop can be blocked. Users, therefore, can't plug unknown, and potentially infected, devices onto the network.

"What's available to the outside world, essentially, is a jack" to connect to the network, said Kay.

The cable connecting the desktop unit and the blade rack can run for 200 meters, or about twice as long as what's required in the vast majority of office buildings. A secure fiber connection that will let the connection go to two kilometers is in the works, Shah said.

A security wrapper prevents data from being sniffed on the connection cable, and the blades are stacked so close together that Ethernet signals would be difficult to separate.

With these factors in mind, the company is targeting several markets: military and government offices (where security concerns are paramount), health care (for remote computing) and financial and manufacturing companies (where space is paramount).

Nothing's ever perfect, however. Squeezing hundreds of Pentium 4 desktops into a centralized rack requires companies to find space in computing rooms and equip the rooms with adequate cooling and noise baffling.

The requisite cooling fans "do make a lot of noise, but it is in the data center," Shah said.

The hardware's also not cheap, leading to a equipment bill that can be 50 percent to 60 percent more expensive, after the specialized racks and other equipment is added together. "They are considerably more expensive," said Ohrenberger.

Nonetheless, Ohrenberger added, "the total cost of ownership bears it out that in the long run it is better."




TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: computers; newglasshouse; techindex

1 posted on 09/22/2002 1:15:52 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; One More Time; ...
Computing is a changing!

Why wouldn't any new well equipped home have it's special room to hold the computing closet. It wouldn't take much space!

Then you could move around the house with wireless comm and a laptop! OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

2 posted on 09/22/2002 1:19:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Bush2000; rdb3; PatrioticAmerican; Dominic Harr
Actually, I just recommended this solution to a brokerage company in New York City. Brokers move constantly and in NYC, every move means Union contractors coming and hauling the computer from one office to another. Gets expensive fast!

So ClearCube means that all that's necessary is a switch of cables in the computer room. Nice.

Another company to consider is 2C Computing. They allow you to put a PCI bus card into the computer and run Cat 5 to a silent box on the desktop. The computer doesn't need to be a special computer like the ClearCube, it can be any computer.

I like the 2C Computing solution so much, I'm thinking about implementing it for the kid's computer so they can't touch the buttons. The box has two USB adapters so I can keep a CD ROM drive and a printer attached to that and they wouldn't beed to touch the actual computer at all!

3 posted on 09/22/2002 1:52:00 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I can see the advantages of such a system.

Note to self: Research this for consulting purposes...

4 posted on 09/22/2002 1:55:58 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
Check it out!
5 posted on 09/22/2002 1:56:47 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Becuase the computer at work and the computer at home and the computer at the summer place and the computer in the plane and the computer at the movie and the computer in the car and the computer in restuarant are all the same computer.

Soon a very small device containing hundreds of gigs of RAM and terrabytes of permantent storage will be your personal computer. It will be about the size of cigarette lighter. Screens keyboards mice and other Io devices will be available everywhere. Just log on to your computer.

You will take it with you every where. Your data is secure because it is in your pocket. And can only be accessed when you want to be accessed.

What you call a server will be a data device for storing and retrieveing encripted data. The future belongs to the DUMB server that is so dumb that no one can hack it. It does not know enough to tell anyone anything about anything. That is what will make it secure for data storage and sharing. The server does not even encript or decript. It does not even know how.

As usual with most of these silly companies. It has it bass ackwards. This will be less successful than thin clients.

Get a clue. The future belongs to extremely thick clients and very thin servers.


6 posted on 09/22/2002 2:23:16 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; All
Sounds like Citrix with proprietary clients ...

I can't imagine how this combo could budget less than a fat-server / low-end desktop setup.

7 posted on 09/22/2002 3:36:06 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
At my employer, for most employees, the IT department--in a blatant power-play--"Locked down" the desktops. In other words, the user can't install any application software without an IT tech being in on the deal--the user is locked out of his own machine!

Supposedly this makes for standardization and lower IT costs.

Not a word about the penalties that are paid by the users and their management. IT has forgotten that it is a service department--and now has delusions of being the boss, which they are feeding by such nonsense.

As I read this article, it looks just like another step to info-serfdom: if you want to use "non standard" software (say, WordPerfect) you must appease the High Gods of Information Technology.

(Me, I reminded the tech that I am an excellent shot--got some targets on my wall, and I physically prevented him from leaving until he "unlocked" my desktop.)

--Boris

8 posted on 09/22/2002 4:09:45 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
bump for later
9 posted on 09/22/2002 4:25:58 PM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Hmmm...I can see some advantage from this, but the benefits seem marginal. They're streamlining the least problematic part of the equation, IMHO.

Fat client maintenance and licensing is a huge IT cost, and needs to be streamlined. There remains a lot of resistance to that, though, although with shrinking IT budgets, it may become a matter of necessity.

10 posted on 09/22/2002 5:11:44 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Fat client maintenance and licensing is a huge IT cost, and needs to be streamlined. There remains a lot of resistance to that, though, although with shrinking IT budgets, it may become a matter of necessity.

This is exactly what I was thinking about.

11 posted on 09/22/2002 5:13:32 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
They have been around awhile haven't they. Just goes to show everyone that there is not that much that is new, except the cost factors keep changing! sounds like some of the old battles may erupt again, the users vs the IT dept!
12 posted on 09/22/2002 5:48:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
sounds like some of the old battles may erupt again, the users vs the IT dept!

Like it or not, the users (their managers) always win these battles.

13 posted on 09/22/2002 5:54:45 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
As they should, but there is an exercise of justification that should benefit the enterprise unless things get out of hand!
14 posted on 09/22/2002 5:57:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
As they should, but there is an exercise of justification that should benefit the enterprise unless things get out of hand!

If ONLY corporate America were this logical. Maybe it is, but I haven't seen it in my corporate IT experience.

15 posted on 09/22/2002 6:08:21 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: boris
At my employer, for most employees, the IT department--in a blatant power-play--"Locked down" the desktops. In other words, the user can't install any application software without an IT tech being in on the deal--the user is locked out of his own machine!

I worked for a client that did the same thing -- dramatically reduced productivity in obvious ways. At the minimum, I believe that anyone remotely involved with development needs a free hand to add programs and modify their desktops or, in the end, the costs of lost flexibility are too high to bear.

16 posted on 09/22/2002 6:54:35 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boris
At my employer, for most employees, the IT department--in a blatant power-play--"Locked down" the desktops. In other words, the user can't install any application software without an IT tech being in on the deal--the user is locked out of his own machine!

Ditto. All PC's are shipped with an approved image. First thing I do when I get a new PC is wipe the drive and re-install everything I need without all the other crap. Of course I never use the corporate helpdesk since I am my own helpdesk. Outside of Outlook; corporate's poor choice for an e-mail system, I don't need anything else they can provide.

17 posted on 09/22/2002 9:48:24 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird; Fractal Trader; boris
Same story here - every issued "corporate-image" PC is immediately wiped and reinstalled. Period.

It takes a little longer, but, hey I gotta use the thing every day, so I'm going to configure it how I like. There is a real hidden cost when folks do this, I don't know why MIS orgs take the "iron fist" approach.

18 posted on 09/22/2002 10:35:15 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
"Your data is secure because it is in your pocket. . ."

Help! I'm late for work and can't find my keys data!

19 posted on 09/23/2002 4:29:57 AM PDT by bandlength
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bandlength
Don't worry. This is a smart data computer not your car keys. It knows you can't keep track of anything. That is why it is tasked with the job of finding you.

In my brave new world. It takes care of you.. not you take care of it.

20 posted on 09/23/2002 7:37:07 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson