Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin Curry
Did you hear OJ's first lawyer 'all but' admit he knew OJ did it. That's why he wouldn't represent him.
74 posted on 09/19/2002 9:00:45 PM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Lower55
Did you hear OJ's first lawyer 'all but' admit he knew OJ did it. That's why he wouldn't represent him.

That's right. As happened here, there were reports that he was exploring a deal when Cochran and Bailey came in and killed it. He effectively withdrew, never twisted the truth or evidence.

He, alone among OJ's lawyers, gained my admiration for his ethical stance.

77 posted on 09/19/2002 9:06:12 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Lower55
Did you hear OJ's first lawyer 'all but' admit he knew OJ did it. That's why he wouldn't represent him.

That's not true, his first lawyer wasn't a criminal defense lawyer. And he didn't withdraw.
86 posted on 09/19/2002 9:13:16 PM PDT by spqrzilla9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Lower55
Did you hear OJ's first lawyer 'all but' admit he knew OJ did it.

I hadn't heard about that. Who was his first lawyer and how did he "all but" admit OJ did it while being constrained by lawyer-client privledge? Was he ever sanctioned?
244 posted on 09/20/2002 7:12:28 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson