[hole_n_one]

In this instance, despite what you and Catherine Crier might believe, O'Reilly is, as Marisa Tomie would say.....dead on, balls accurate.

[spqrzilla9]

No, he's not. What O'Reilly is doing is attempting to undermine the most basic principles of our system of justice.

[johnny7]

“Dead on Balls” is pretty accurate. Posi-traction is also good.

[HamiltonJay]

Absolutely, there is a huge difference between forcing the government to prove its case, and lying to the court. These guys lied to the court, that is not acceptable.

Had they said other people had access to the home... that is not a lie. But to say other people had access to the home and they likely or could have done it.. that is a patentedly lie by this attorney. You cannot suggest alternate theories you know to be false... once you know your client is guilty your only defense can be to force the government to prove theirs.. you no longer can present "alternate possibilities" you know to be false.