To: John Jamieson
I can't convince you, you are unconvincable. You *want* others to be involved, the parents or pornographers in SD. If the physical evidence, DW's lack of an alibi, he had the time to do it, he doesn't proclaim his innocence, & he collected child porn, didn't do it for you. Now neighbors come forward & say he was a peeping tom, old friends admit to strange goings on with their kids, exwives talk, his grandfather was a molester & he spent time there while it was going on. You hang on to bug evidence, dog evidence or lack of & ignore the obvious. Blood, fingerprints, hair, fibers & plenty of time to do it. You don't want to be convinced.
359 posted on
09/22/2002 10:36:54 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: Ditter
You're happy with the story you have, so be drop it and let some of the rest of us investigate a little more. We're not convinced that the story is that simple.
Why harp on us for being bad people, or stupid. You're entitled to your opinion, we heard it, but that's all it is. We have one too.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson