[John Jamieson]

Great find Val.

"The detectives said to DW:"I know you had something to do with it. Let's help Danielle's family. Let her go to heaven in peace. Get her a proper burial".
Westerfield said "As far as I'm concerned, my life's over."
Keyser says" Help us get Danielle back. Have the common decency to help us. Show a little remorse and help us get her back."
Westerfield said,"As far as I am concerned I didn't do it."

That last line is creepy. I fits with a theory I'm working on that has DW and one or two others involved in Danielle's death. DW didn't snatch her, and didn't kill her and didn't dump the body, but he did provide the party vehicle and knew what was going on. Under CA law, he would still be guilty as sin, but he didn't "feel" guilty of those three things.

His strange remarks about the porno, also indicate he was working on it for someone else and didn't care a bit about what was in it. Was he compliling CDROM's for someone else to market?

[John Jamieson]

I need HELP from local SD researchers:

Paul Whitmore, 43, Grantville, CA was arrested on 1/27/2002 for distributing photos of himself having sex with a girl under 10 on the internet, and had a hearing on 2/15.

WAS WHITMORE IN JAIL ON THE WEEKEND OF 2/1/2002
OR DID HE MAKE BAIL?

[CW_Conservative]

"The detectives said to DW:"I know you had something to do with it. Let's help Danielle's family. Let her go to heaven in peace. Get her a proper burial".

Westerfield said "As far as I'm concerned, my life's over."

Keyser says" Help us get Danielle back. Have the common decency to help us. Show a little remorse and help us get her back."

Westerfield said,"As far as I am concerned I didn't do it."

That last line is creepy. I fits with a theory I'm working on that has DW and one or two others involved in Danielle's death.

DW didn't snatch her, and didn't kill her and didn't dump the body, but he did provide the party vehicle and knew what was going on. Under CA law, he would still be guilty as sin, but he didn't "feel" guilty of those three things.

I think you have to take into consideration how many times and in how many different ways Westerfield had been asked the question, "Did you kill her".

The police have already told him they believe he did it and the proceeding questions demostrate how they have re-phrased this belief.

So when Westerfield said,"As far as I am concerned I didn't do it," this is just Dave re-phrasing the fact that he is still innocent.

[Ditter]

My thoughts on *others* involved with DW in a porno ring are, when DW saw that it was all over (his life was over) he would have confessed & impalcated the others. As it stands, he is going to death row & the *others* are continuing in their business of child porn.

Would *your* lips still be sealed if in the same circumstances? Mine sure wouldn't be!

[Valpal1]

>>>>> but he didn't
"feel" guilty of those three things. <<<<

JJ, LOL at your interpretation.

Det. Redden and FBI criminal profilers will tell you those are the weasel words of guilt conflicting with fear of punishment. He didn't make confindent and strong denials, because he didn't "feel" innocent!

These types of sexual killers working in tandem or cooperatively with one another is extremeley RARE. DW did this crime as the culmination of years of peeping, skulking, and fantasizing. He finally acted out his desires and you can bet he didn't invite any helpers who might interfere with his violence/control fantasies by wanting to do differently according to their fantasies (this is why they seldom seek partners in these crimes). He is the perfect example of escalating depravity.

The porno ring you so want to tie him to manifestly did not kill any of their victims. The methods and reasons for their crimes are very different and I have no doubt that these guys were questioned (and property) searched looking for that link. The FBI and SDPD would have been thrilled and delighted by such a link, because they could charge these creeps with felony murder on top of the porno charges. Also being able to tie a porn ring into a grisly kidnap murder would act to open the spigots of funding (think congressional grandstanding)for the FBI task force on crimes against children. And don't think Ashcroft would ignore this opportunity to blacken SCOTUS' eye with it, as he was extremely put out with their gutting of the federal child porn statute.

Assuming that because there has been no media accounts of cross-investigation, that there has been no cross-investigation is specious logic.

You are still absolutely dead wrong on every aspect of this case. But keep flailing about, you might come up with some niggardly detail you can claim you were right about.