On one level, our system is quite simple. The prosecution exaggerats the value of their "evidence" and the defense exaggerates the value of "reasonable doubt". The jury then decides the "true" facts.
I thought you agreed with the jury's verdict? What's the problem? Would you have been happier if DW was given a much weaker defense? Why not have no trial at all then?
Here's my talking points.
- It's an outrage that anyone who might be guilty is still walking around free, threatening our very lifes and children.
- Lock 'em all up, I mean, what the heck do we have prisons for.
- I say -- get the police out there NOW! -- and let's start pulling these wackos and perverts off the streets now.
- The current process is corrupt, abysmal.
- It only allows liars and abusers another chance to lie.
- Get those
paddy wagons Department of Corrections prisoner buses out on the streets today. No more waiting around for this sick "liberal" gimmick called due process. - We've gotta sweep the streets clean today!
It's an outrage. And I really don't want your pithy *moronic* comments anymore either. Why do you *idiots* even bother. That's another outrage.
Tune in tommorrow -- we're coming back with yet more outrageous outrages in YOUR town.
--- Bill O'Reilly, outraged.