[cyncooper]

In all the cases, the testimony was true and relevant.

No, the points the defense tried to make were false and proven to be false by the prosecution after the defense did their muddying of the waters.

[Jaded]

Whatever.

[John Jamieson]

"No, the points the defense tried to make were false and proven to be false by the prosecution after the defense did their muddying of the waters."

Would not that be the case in just about all lost cases? What's different here? (You watched it, that's what was different.)