Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
Show us the money, with a detective's name signed to it -- that a proposal brought by Feldman to detectives contained such information. Before that, it is so much unfounded insinuation.

The same kind of insinuation that Feldman presented in trial as evidence that Westerfield was innocent?

-PJ

153 posted on 09/20/2002 12:02:40 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
You may remember that under our legal system the TOTAL burden of proof is on the prosecution. The defense is required to prove nothing. I believe that this system was purposeful.
154 posted on 09/20/2002 12:05:57 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
Feldman has the right to insinuate that. The detectives may have a right to insinuate the opposite. That doesn't mean they aren't sleazes if they know they are wrong (and unlike Feldman -- who would only have a strong reason to suspect Westerfield's guilt -- the detectives WOULD know they are wrong).
158 posted on 09/20/2002 12:12:34 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
Feldman has the right to insinuate that. The detectives may have a right to insinuate the opposite [I mean, that Feldman knew of Westerfield's knowledge of the body's location. - HTRN] . That doesn't mean they aren't, respectively, sleazes if they know they are wrong (and unlike Feldman -- who would only have a strong reason to suspect Westerfield's guilt -- the detectives WOULD have a reason to know they are wrong).
162 posted on 09/20/2002 12:15:54 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson