[HiTech RedNeck]

Oh, and as I have pointed out time and again, knowing where the body was may strongly implicate his guilt but it would not logically prove it to a 100%. As long as even (for the sake of argument) 1% possibility of innocence existed, his lawyers were within rights to push that possibility to the hilt in court.

[John Jamieson]

You're doing a great job, hang in there!

I've decided to also examine the possiblity that if DW did do it (which is different than was it proven), who was the accomplise? if you buy the 4 bugguy's calculations, as I do, somebody else is involved. There's also the little matter of unidentified fingerprints in the VD house.

One poster yesterday said she would have convicted DW on the one fringerprint in the RV alone, but the extra fingerprints in the vD house bothered her not a bit!