To: John Jamieson
Good snag, John.
As much as I don't want to know about the particulars in this issue, :-( I'll do what I can to help you gather info.
How about starting a new thread on this topic, so we have a place to stash what we find?
I've seen speculation on whether the real reason for the pr firm to be brought into Danielle's case at the beginning was to see that it wasn't connected with the porn ring busts. Makes you wonder is a decision was made somewhere to leak the 'swinging' info to get the sheeple on a sex, drugs and rock & roll, so that they wouldn't think to hard about what else was going on in the same metro area that month. I wouldn't be surprised.
Separating the two would also explain why the drumbeat has gone on, and been strengthened regarding DW's 'creepiness,' instead of just rejoicing that the threat is identified and behind bars, and life can go on again. The vd's are still obviously concerned about their children's safety. That came across very clearly in that interview the other night.
To: pinz-n-needlez
Yes, your PR firm thoughts seem right on. Many people think this a very simple case, it seems to me to be exactly the opposite. Many players contributed to Danielle's death, so much had to be hidden. Even DW may not know the whole story.
I want to get a few more facts for my white paper and then I'll start a new thread.
To: pinz-n-needlez
You have mail
112 posted on
09/22/2002 10:38:13 AM PDT by
BARLF
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson