To: pinz-n-needlez
i think the including of the porn and the way they were used in the opning statment may well be grounds for a mistrial by causing predugical attude in jurors
10 posted on
09/19/2002 6:35:47 PM PDT by
mouser
To: mouser
You're right, mouser.
And then Dusek drove the point home over, and over, and over, and over during closing arguments.
It was one big emotional circle, but they had to get a couple drops of dna in there for a plausible conviction.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson