Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ChocChipCookie
Kind of makes you wonder about the credibility of MK recognizing and identifying the voice.

There are certainly problems with my scenario as I mentioned in my last post but I wouldn't question MK's credibility. It would not be enough to actually charge Richard with the crime that's for sure. It will be interesting to find out how the line up was handled and how they got the sample of Richards words. I believe for it to be even remotely admissible in court he would have had to have his attorney present and known that he was being recorded for that purpose. I'm not a lawyer but I don't think I'm too far off on this. No matter how you cut it though, sometime after the 1st of August Lois made her statement about MK recognizing the voice and then on the 14th of August the family released their statement where they clearly indicated that they felt Richard was involved.

105 posted on 08/30/2002 11:48:32 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: sandude
I remember early in the investigation when the SLPD was still holding press conferences daily, that Dinse wouldn't elaborate on the exact words that the abductor used when he was speaking to Elizabeth. He just said that the abductor had threatened Elizabeth's life. I'll be the police did get pretty close to the exact words from Mary Katherine, and just like on TV, the police recorded several men saying those words, and MK picked out Ricci. Just MY theory, but it kind of goes along with yours.
111 posted on 08/30/2002 11:58:39 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson