Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cagey
For what you get, it's less money than buying a new CD every month.

My thoughts exactly.

I am a HUGE lover of music; always have been since I was a kid. I was really into "alternative" music in my teens, in the early 70s, and I have tried to keep up with the "good stuff" in a wide variety of genre ever since.

I like virtually everything as long as it's "good," which I define (very subjectively, I admit) as ANYTHING that someone put great thought and effort into.

The dreck that passes for mainstream pop has always been foul to me, whether we're talking about "The Partridge Family" in the early 70s or Britney Spears/N'Sync/Backstreet Boys ad nauseum today.

And I think most "hip-hop" is actually dragging our impressionable youth into the swamp out of which they cannot escape. Yet I think a lot of what passes for "hip-hop" these days is very good (Carl Craig is one name that comes to mind).

So I don't care what the "style" is, as long as someone tries to put wit and intelligence into it.

Unfortunately, the cost of CDs is such that you simply can't purchase enough of them to enable you to explore what you haven't had time to listen to--and it's surprising how much "stuff" that is universally accepted as "great stuff" I haven't had time to hear yet, even after years.

For example: I bought SIX CDs the other day, including one two-disc retrospective of the B-52s. And it cost nearly $100! My budget won't allow me to get everything I want. As it is, my CD collection is about 250 discs, but it's barely passable, IMO.

With my tastes, you'd have to get up around the 1,500 mark before you'd have something approaching "representative".

But the Rhapsody service may quite possibly make it all a moot point. If I can listen to a wide range of things--especially the stuff I've never had time to explore--then I can decide on purchasing the discs later on, when portability becomes important.

IMO, the music industry needs to get in line. They need to understand they'd better come up with a way to make money off digital music distribution, because that train is leaving the station with them or without them!

THIS ARTICLE from a couple of months ago, which includes some details of where Listen.Com/Rhapsody has been and where it may be heading, is a case in point. Just look at the numbers of people sharing music files online; it has GROWN since the effective death of Napster, which supposedly was going to nip it all in the bud.

Anyway, finally getting a chance to listen to all of The Clash's "Combat Rock" as I type. Great!

6 posted on 08/23/2002 2:39:01 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Illbay
I've been involved with XM radio and I think it's great for someone who spends much of their time in a car, truck, RV, or boat. There are a hundred channels with many different venues available. Thirty or so of the channels are commercial free and you can tune into a station that plays classical or choose a station that plays jazz or another station that plays only hits from the 60's. And it is all digital reception. There is a weather channel, all news channels, comedy channels, religious channels, etc. and you can receive the same channel coast to coast without losing the signal. Another nice feature is that the artist and song title are displayed. And this service is also 9.95 per month.
However, as you pointed out earlier, the programmer chooses the titles you listen to. I imagine down the road XM and it's competitor will figure out a way for the listener to choose a playlist.

Thanks for the link. I may just sign up tonight
7 posted on 08/23/2002 2:51:19 PM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson