[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

This is part of the 'Constitutionalist' drivel that fringe freeper Matthews believed in, leading him to blow away the cop in Massillon, Ohio a week ago. His paranoid ravings accepted this nonsense about the '13th Amendment' and took it to it's logical conclusion: Since all legislatures and Congresses since this time included lawyers, the laws they passed were unconstitutional! He then said that since these laws, including traffic laws were illegal, he had a right to resist them with murderous violence.

It looks like JimRob will have some real cleaning up to do around here after he gets back from the Friva!

[Cato]

It looks like JimRob will have some real cleaning up to do around here after he gets back from the Friva!

My, are we going to CENSOR what we don't agree with??

I just love Amerikans like you who believe in Free Speech and Discussion.

Does the 1st read "You have the right of free speech just as long as you are not dumb enough to use it"??

CATO

[Cultural Jihad]

A believer in the drivel Suzie_Cue is polluting the forum with.
Ideology kills.

[Kevin Curry]

He then said that since these laws, including traffic laws were illegal, he had a right to resist them with murderous violence.

If that's true, then according to the Constitutionalist view, the cop would have been in the clear had he simply walked up to Matthews without notice and put a bullet through his head. After all, the laws defining murder would have applied equally to Taylor and Matthews. If the laws were invalid as to one, they were invalid as to both.

Matthews was living an anarchist delusion, protected by the fact that almost no one else subscribed to his loony anarchist theories.