Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: I Corps; All
Prove it.

I'm not a lawyer, but in my casual reading of the article:

In fact, the 13th Amendment makes it very clear that any person within the ranks of government holding public office, found to have a title of nobility or to be accepting 'honors' must lose his position and FORFEIT HIS CITIZENSHIP to the United States

it seems the intent was to prevent lawyers and others in power in government from being influenced by favors from leaders in other governments, particularly England.

If I recall my history correctly:

Maryland 12- 25-1810
Ohio 1-31-1811
Kentucky 1-31-1811
Pennsylvania 2-6-1811
Delaware 2-2-1811
New Jersey 2-13-1811
Vermont 10-24-1811
Tennessee 11-21-1811
Georgia 12-13-1811
North Carolina 12-23-1811
Massachusetts 2-27-1812
New Hampshire 12-10-1812

We were at war with England at this time (1812), and emotions were running high. I'm reading the John Adams book, and I know that jealousies and animosities ran high against the US long after we set down our arms against the Brits.

My reading of the situation is that some in government for some reason felt that anyone accepting priveliges from a foreign concern needed to be treated as a traitor.

Isn't that what we all said about Clinton, and his dealings with the Chinese and James Riady?

19 posted on 08/18/2002 7:43:55 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


Is the title of "esquire" granted to lawyers by a foreign government or power?

No? It's just something they call themselves?

Glad we cleared that up. That didn't take long, did it?

25 posted on 08/18/2002 9:43:41 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson