[KnutCase]

I always thought it was the defense that didn't have to prove anything. My mistake. You're always bringing me back into the real world.

[the Deejay]

Whereas, in this trial, the defense did more "proving" (as well as debunking) than the prosecutor.

[NatureGirl]

I always thought it was the defense that didn't have to prove anything

In this case (per Jeff Dusek) the prosecution didn't have to "prove nuttin' to nobody" neither.

Why bother with that smelly ol' system of justice anyway? Taxpayers could just forward their checks to the DA, everyone gets paid, and the "suspect" (wink wink) gets to meet Mr. Hemp at dawn.