[sawsalimb]

nope-gotta go look. But if Ott has been credibly accused of falsifying(or otherwise tampering) with evidence in other cases(Is he the detective who was formally reprimanded for evidence tampering on another case? think so...),as far as I'm concerned,the prosecution's case just turned into a slowly expanding cloud of sub atomic particles. Of course that's me talking,and my vote doesn't count.

[small_l_libertarian]

Yes. Scary, ain't it?

[small_l_libertarian]

Here you go:

In the Nov. 29, 2000, memo, an investigator for the District Attorney's Office informed a prosecutor of his belief that Ott and Keyser falsified facts in an affidavit to get an arrest warrant for a man held in the case.

Link: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/20020416-9999_1m16wester.html