To: UCANSEE2
I'm positive SD LE had no idea about DNA extraction
on a tooth! I thought the forensics dentist would
mention it, he didn't. I thought the ME would mention
it, he didn't. I thought *someone anyone* in forensics
would mention it (including Doosuk or Clarke), they
didn't.
To: the Deejay
I'm positive SD LE had no idea about DNA extraction on a tooth! I thought the forensics dentist would mention it, he didn't. I thought the ME would mention it, he didn't. I thought *someone anyone* in forensics would mention it (including Doosuk or Clarke), they didn't. Well, does that tell us anything? It wouldn't be my first thought, if I wanted to plant DNA on something. But then I am not an EXPERIENCED DETECTIVE, who studies these type of things, testifies in trials to these kind of things, and who has been caught planting evidence before. (Might have figured out a better technique, to avoid detection)
To: the Deejay; UCANSEE2
Yes...this just adds the more to the unanswered questions surrounding this case.
Also, the tooth may have been taken out shortly after her death, before bad decomposition set in..or God forbid, as others have talked about earlier, it could have been extracted whilst she was alive. :-(
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson