Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo
I think that Brenda kept referring to a scratch on Danielle's back from Layla. That is didn't bleed.

Now, Danielle's PJ's had a bloodtype stain on the anklet. My guess is that Danielle had a scratch from the dog or something that DID BLEED (obviously, on the PJ's) and since Damon and Brenda both were trying to say those Pj's, laying on Danielle's floor, inside out, were NOT HERS, that would mess up their story. SO,somehow they had it already established that Defense couldn't bring that up as there was no proof, because the LE's test didn't come up with Danielle's DNA from it. Because someone (LE) didn't want it to.

531 posted on 08/15/2002 3:38:03 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
Do you think computer experts could figure out what was left at the dry cleaners and when?
543 posted on 08/15/2002 3:47:50 PM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
Damon and Brenda both were trying to say those Pj's, laying on Danielle's floor, inside out, were NOT HERS,

IIRC Brenda said that the pjs that were on the floor were not those Danielle was wearing that night. Danielle supposedly was wearing the twin of the pair her grandmother held up for the media. That pair was, according to Brenda, worn by Danielle's friend at sleepovers. I wonder if the friend's mother can corraborate that.

681 posted on 08/15/2002 5:41:52 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson