Replies

Is this the receipt from the SUV or the receipt from off of the clothes?

The receipt that was on the clothes was testified to as having this info on it.

Can you, or anyone else tell me why Feldman didn't make any more of a fuss about the reciept indicating the jacket was dropped off on 1/26?? I started off in this case pretty much disbelieving that someone like Westerfield was capable of this crime without showing some sort of pre-disposition to it in the past. Now that I have really looked at the evidence, including non-matching fibers, a single fingerprint, and 'no-hit' hit by 180 Frank, the bug guys, and now the very real possibility that the DNA was planted on the jacket, I really don't see how a conviction is possible. Of course I know this IS Kalifornia, but come on, this had to be the worst performance I've ever seen by a prosecutor. But I digress. So any idea why Feldman just kind of left the receipt topic just knd of hang there??