Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mudd Letters Opened To Public: Van Dam Jurors Continue to Mull and Ponder Westerfield's Fate! 8-15
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Union Trib

Posted on 08/14/2002 9:29:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Letters to judge opened to public


SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 14, 2002

The judge in the trial of David Westerfield today allowed reporters to see court log entries of notes from jurors, as well as letters to the judge from the public about the murder of Danielle van Dam.

The letters from the public included a variety of theories about the case.

One letter-writer sent the following theory to Judge William Mudd: "Danielle van Dam killed herself.''

A nearly illegible postcard with a Spokane postmark alluded to at least one ex-wife "with a drinking problem (who) lives in Spokane.''

 


DAN TREVAN / Union-Tribune
Some of the folders of documents made public by Judge William Mudd.
The writer failed to indicate whether the reference was to ex-wives of Westerfield – who has been married and divorced twice – or someone else connected with the case.

The postcard was unsigned.

Another missive came from a man who referenced another high-profile murder trial – that of O.J. Simpson.

"The O.J. Simpson case was a miscarriage of the state's justice mainly because Judge (Lance) Ito was too lenient with the actors defending O.J.,'' the man wrote.

There was no news Wednesday afternoon about the status of deliberations, but Mudd announced he was holding a sealed hearing 9:30 a.m. Thursday to consider an unspecified defense motion in the case.

Wednesday was the fifth day of deliberations. The prosecution concluded its closing arguments last Thursday.

Westerfield is accused of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home and killing her.

He could face life in prison or the death penalty if convicted of murder with special circumstances.

He has also been charged with misdemeanor possession of child pornography.

The log entries show that on Friday, the jury requested ``all available evidence of pornographic images'' and a photograph of a teen-age daughter of the defendant's ex-girlfriend.



TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; vandamswingers; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 921-930 next last
To: Jaded
Annette Peer..June 20.

Q. THE RESULTS THAT YOU DID OBTAIN FOR THE BLOOD FROM THE JACKET LAPEL, HOWEVER, ARE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING COME FROM MR. WESTERFIELD; IS THAT CORRECT?

A. THAT'S CORRECT.

321 posted on 08/15/2002 12:07:58 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to lend another Voice of Reason here. They are needed on both sides of this issue. That's the only way the truth can come out.
322 posted on 08/15/2002 12:09:20 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Oh yes, I've followed local trials very closely. Much more than this one and recorded them as well. I have a good sized library. Never seen any transcripts posted online, but the tapes are just as good, if not better. I can back them up time after time & replay. Which I've done many times.

Local trials haven't involved hair or fiber evidence however. Nor DNA. But a whole lot of direct evidence.
323 posted on 08/15/2002 12:10:47 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to lend another Voice of Reason here. They are needed on both sides of this issue. That's the only way the truth can come out.

Thanks, Judy. I'm outa here for awhile again, but had time this morning to review some articles and today's comments.

324 posted on 08/15/2002 12:11:04 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The Redden tape has been redacted and edited. Do we know WHEN it was redacted and edited? This is going to sound all tinfoil hat, but if the police/prosecutor knew that they had "stretched the truth" about what DW actually said, and that Mudd had covered their butts by sealing the affidavit, they would want to make sure that the interview tape matched their story, not DW's. But now the affidavits are unsealed (I want to see them, too) - so maybe he did tell Redden, and we just don't know it (yet).
325 posted on 08/15/2002 12:12:33 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
I've seen photos of BVD on the day of the abduction and she didn't look much better than she has in court.
326 posted on 08/15/2002 12:13:37 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Q. THE RESULTS THAT YOU DID OBTAIN FOR THE BLOOD FROM THE JACKET LAPEL, HOWEVER, ARE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING COME FROM MR. WESTERFIELD; IS THAT CORRECT?

A. THAT'S CORRECT.

Shaving accident?

327 posted on 08/15/2002 12:13:44 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: nycgal
Could be...there were many DNA markers missing from the sample..wonder if it was really old also?
328 posted on 08/15/2002 12:16:20 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Here is more:

Q DID YOU ALSO TEST I BELIEVE THE LABEL NUMBER WAS 48A, THE BEDSPREAD FROM THE MOTOR HOME THAT YOU HAD EARLIER DESCRIBED OBTAINING A POSITIVE PRESUMPTIVE BLOODSTAIN RESULT?

A YES, I DID.

Q WITH WHAT RESULT?

A THE D.N.A. TYPES THAT WERE RECOVERED WERE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING ORIGINATED FROM DAVID WESTERFIELD.

Q WHAT ABOUT ITEM 94D-3, THE JACKET STAIN FROM THE NECK AREA? I MAY HAVE ASKED YOU THIS, BUT IF YOU COULD JUST DESCRIBE IT.

A COULD YOU REPEAT THE ITEM NUMBER ON THAT?

Q SURE. 94D-3.

A NO D.N.A. TYPES WERE RECOVERED FROM THAT ITEM

329 posted on 08/15/2002 12:17:44 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: demsux
"Who is that woman in the montage (the one wearing the matching shirt as Danielle)? "


No, I have no idea & didn't focus on her too much.

330 posted on 08/15/2002 12:18:08 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I'm guessing that it's Barb Easton.
331 posted on 08/15/2002 12:19:08 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
My understanding is the redaction was done during hearings involving the prosecution, defense, and the judge.

Now I really am gone...

332 posted on 08/15/2002 12:19:49 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Easton is a big woman. Very tall & lots of big hair.
333 posted on 08/15/2002 12:20:14 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
We don't know what she looked like even a day before Danielle was gone.

Stoned and excited for the activities to come the following night , Girls night out!

334 posted on 08/15/2002 12:22:33 PM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thank you.
335 posted on 08/15/2002 12:22:53 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Jaded
In one affidavit, San Diego police Detective Terry Torgersen said Westerfield told detectives he submitted items for cleaning at Twin Peaks Cleaners the morning of Feb. 4.

CYNCOOPER: I say the affidavit and search warrant were not drawn up until 2/7 (I believe), NOT 2/4 or even 2/5. The detective first had to track down the drycleaners. The article about the affidavit states that DW told the police about the trip he made on 2/4. The article does not state DW disclosed the trip to them *on* 2/4. JADED, CYNCOOPER. HERE is a link to all the WARRANT NUMBERS:

CFAC

AND HERE IS THE LINK to some recent affidavits

WESTERFIELD DOCUMENTS

AND HERE is the SEARCH WARRANT FOR THE DRY CLEANERS. AND it is dated FEB 7th. (CYN!)

DRY CLEANERS SEARCH WARRANT

336 posted on 08/15/2002 12:23:53 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
These aren't the recently unsealed affidavits tho...these have been there..IIRC
337 posted on 08/15/2002 12:28:15 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Yes. I'd like to read the affidavit as well. It seems as if you're saying that what Torgersen said in the affidavit is just "confirmation" of what Det. Ott had already figured out from the receipt, ie, "Is Twin Peaks the dry cleaners you used?" DW - "Yes."

So, based on that, Torgersen can now state "DW told us he dropped things off at Twin Peaks dry cleaners on 2/4". Of course, that's pretty innocuous - and makes me wonder why the affidavit had to be sealed.
338 posted on 08/15/2002 12:29:15 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Thanks for the correction. Maybe I just THOUGHT I'd lost my last illusions.

My exposure has been limited to crime & forensics shows on TV, so I guess you can figure out why I got so upset with this trial.
339 posted on 08/15/2002 12:29:46 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Who is that woman in the montage (the one wearing the matching shirt as Danielle)?

I think it is Brenda with long hair (and dark roots). Maybe taken during Disney World trip? Brenda did testify they got haircuts (plural) on Jan. 26th. Apparently Brenda got a haircut and dye job.

340 posted on 08/15/2002 12:31:09 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 921-930 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson