[carenot]

Among the computer images seized from his house were photos of his ex-girlfriend's daughter, identified as Danielle L., in poses that prosecutors argue are sexually provocative. She is now 17.

Does that mean she had clothes on but posed sticking her butt or chest out?

[KnutCase]

She was sitting on a lounger by the pool with her legs apart and her Mom snapped a picture. Myself, I couldn't be sure that it was "posed". Some of my daughter's friends would sit in strange positions without even being aware of it. So what's the big deal? Sounds like it could have been innocent to me.

[UCANSEE2]

Does that mean she had clothes on but posed sticking her butt or chest out?

Here is the story on the picture. LE and Prosecutor tried to make the case that this picture showed DW was a child molestor. They had found this image on his computer. It was a picture of his girlfriends daughter. It was taken out by the pool. She is lying in a chair, in a bathing suit, suntanning, and her legs are spread over the sides of the chair. LOOKS BAD, right?

Well, if you only list to the LE and Prosecutor.

Here is the "REST OF THE STORY".

Turns out the picture was taken by her mother. Her mother sent the DIGITAL IMAGE via EMAIL to DW to see if he could use some software to CROP the image and get a better print, because she had shot the image off center. I.E. The girl's head was at the top and the 'lap' area was at the center of the image.

DW didn't even take the picture. NOTICE that PROSECUTION didn't mention that part.