Hi AppyPappy..It's a little late in the game to ask for answers, when we've probably give the same answer over 100 times to any question you might have, if you took the time to read these threads.
But there are two schools of thought to a witness testifying. They should and they shouldn't. The popular professional opinion has been for the Defendant NOT to take the stand.
I personally, think at the end of the day, that he should have. He could have explained the "we" in the tape being used against him. I think he used "we" went this way or that way, because he was USED to having someone with him and he was frazzled in the interview. He had only just broken up with his Girlfriend.
Stay tuned..Pappy.
sw
#38..I agree.
I think the 'we' was in reference to past times.....as in...'we usually go to Glamis'....or whatever.
Dusek would have had Westerfield in the horrible position of testifying against his own beloved son.
Hey Spectre who has the jury list and guesses? CTV juts said a while ago they believe Juror 10 is foreman..