Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FresnoDA
I've been watching the trial on a semi-regular basis. Seems one of the points the defense is using is there was no evidence that Westerfield was in the Van Dam house and Danielle's bedroom. She wasn't discovered missing until 0900 the next day. Perhaps she wandered outside to take the dog out, and that's when Westerfield snatched/conned her. Can some-one clear this up for me.
17 posted on 08/14/2002 5:30:19 AM PDT by Momma Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Momma Lou
Well, my impression of the Van Dam house was

Come one, come all....

They were freewheeling in the sexual department, and offering invitations to strangers at Dad's Bar.

Did anyone truly investigate the comings & goings of ALL the possibilities of folks who ACTUALLY were invited & entered the house, and would know it's layout?

This is what steams me!!!

18 posted on 08/14/2002 5:39:19 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Momma Lou
Hi Mommma Lou, the other possibility is he was smart enough to wear gloves, hat etc ..before entering the house.
106 posted on 08/14/2002 9:11:35 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson