[Freedom2specul8]

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/20020625-9999_1m25hair.html

Hair similar to Danielle van Dam's was found on sheets in David Westerfield's bedroom, and authorities found fibers in his motor home that appear to match fibers from the girl's bedroom carpet, a criminalist testified yesterday.

Also, hairs similar to the van Dams' family dog were found in Westerfield's house, his motor home and on a comforter he dropped off at a dry cleaner, criminalist Tanya DuLaney said.

DuLaney, who works in the San Diego Police Department crime lab, testified on a day when prosecutors used charts and blow-up photos in an attempt to show that traces of the 7-year-old girl were scattered throughout Westerfield's domain

---

can also be confirmed in transcripts.

[Rheo]

Please confirm the info in 122 with the transcripts as it is not accurate...case in point:

Also, hairs similar to the van Dams' family dog were found in Westerfield's house, his motor home and on a comforter he dropped off at a dry cleaner, criminalist Tanya DuLaney said.

The "layla" hairs that were sent to Veterinary Genetics came back non reportable....were not matched to ANY dog, let alone Layla.

Hairs and fibers that Ms. Dulaney opines are Danielle's..turn out not to be when tested.

[Jaded]

Similar means MitDNA which also means Brenda, Derrick, Danielle and Damon. Ooops, I did it again. ;-)

[Yeti]

Hair similar to Danielle van Dam's was found on sheets in David Westerfield's bedroom, and authorities found fibers in his motor home that appear to match fibers from the girl's bedroom carpet, a criminalist testified yesterday.

Also, hairs similar to the van Dams' family dog were found in Westerfield's house, his motor home and on a comforter he dropped off at a dry cleaner, criminalist Tanya DuLaney said.

DuLaney, who works in the San Diego Police Department crime lab, testified on a day when prosecutors used charts and blow-up photos in an attempt to show that traces of the 7-year-old girl were scattered throughout Westerfield's domain

You know, I'm sure that it's just a coincidence, but if the hairs were not Danielle's, and the fiber were not a match, and the dog hairs were not Layla's, these people might not be found guilty for perjury or falsifying evidence, because of the way it is phrased.

Kim, I can't tell you how happy I am to see you back(because I am trying to be polite after my last ranting post).