[alisasny]

Regarding the porn in question, namely the 100 or so images of supposed child porn.

Are they of pre-pubescent girls or girls over 18 who are posed to look under 18?

I am sure this has been discussed but figured you could provide me an answer.

Has Nancy Grace stated for the record that they are actual photos of prepubescent girls?

[Politicalmom]

Nancy Grace doesn't GET to state things for the "record", and yes, she did say that. Of couse, the judge called them cartoons, but what would he know??

[connectthedots]

You may have noticed I addressed the porn issue last. I don't think the porn evidence proves anything and I think the prosecution included it primarily in order to appeal to the emotions of the jury. I think it borders on being so prejudicial it might be the basis for the reversal of any conviction in the appellate courts.

After this number of days, I think the jury is split into two primary groups. One group which believes that the fiber/hair/DNA evidence is conclusive (even though the prosecutor never seemed to be able to establish when it was deposited) and another group that basically will hold to the believe that the dogs and the bugs don't lie, and that there is no evidence of DW having been in the VD home. If he was never in the VD home, he didn't commit the crimes.

I am leaning towards a hung jury, which would give the prosecution an opportunity to retry DW at a later date if they can develope the evidence further. The DA will look at the evidence and decide not to retry him immediately, which will force the court to release DW without bail. Maybe then the prosecutor will start looking at other suspects; especially Damon or someone Damon may have 'loaned' Danielle to. I am not convinced Danielle was in the house when she was abducted.