Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Jurors ask to hear recorded Westerfield interview

Judge Mudd lashes out at talk radio 'idiots,'
bars KFMB radio producer from courtroom

SIGNONSANDIEGO STAFF
and WIRE SERVICES

August 13, 2002A San Diego jury spent a brief second day deliberating August 9, 2002 in the trial of David Westerfield, man accused of kidnapping and murdering 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, before breaking for the weekend without reaching a verdict in the closely watched case. Judge William D. Mudd goes over the jury verdict form with jurors before sending them into deliberations in the trial at the San Diego courthouse on August 8.  (Dan Trevan/San Diego Herald Tribune via Reuters)

The fourth day of deliberations in the David Westerfield trial has ended with no conclusion by the jury. The jury will resume deliberations Wednesday morning at the San Diego County Courthouse. Earleir today, jurors asked to hear Westerfield's only recorded explanation of what he was doing the weekend 7-year-old Danielle van Dam was kidnapped.

Superior Court Judge William Mudd said he was granting a request from the jury for a tape recording and transcript of the taped interview Westerfield gave to police interrogation specialist Paul Redden on Feb. 4, two days after Danielle's disappearance.

During the interview, Westerfield makes a reference to "we" as he describes his meandering trip through San Diego and Imperial counties on Feb. 2 and Feb. 3.

"The little place we, we were at was just a little small turnoff-type place," Westerfield said.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of murder, kidnapping and a special circumstance allegation that the killing of Danielle van Dam occurred during the commission of kidnapping.

He is also accused of the misdemeanor possession of child pornography.

Jurors are in their fourth day of deliberations.

Mudd's disclosure came during a 10 a.m. open hearing on a request from KFMB-AM 760 to let River Stillwood, an assistant radio producer for talk show host Rick Roberts, back into the courtroom to cover the trial.

"She's out and will remain out and will not be permitted in for any live proceedings... because she is the representative of an individual who takes great glee and delight shoving it in this court's face," Mudd said.

Mudd ejected Stillwood from the courtroom on Thursday after asking her to tell him who told Roberts about the details of a Wednesday exchange between Mudd and the attorneys in the case during a sealed hearing.

Stillwood told Mudd that she didn't know who gave Roberts the information. On the air, Roberts later said he had received a call from a source in the courthouse.

The court is conducting an internal investigation, but cannot compel Roberts and Stillwood to name their source, Mudd said.

Stillwood can still sit in the pressroom and watch the video feed of any court activity, Mudd said.

KFMB was welcome to send someone else to sit in the courtroom, so long as the person was representing the radio station and not Roberts, he said.

KFMB's attorney Joann Rezzo argued that the disclosure did not violate the defendant's right to a fair trial. She also argued that Stillwood didn't give him "the source of the leak" because she didn't know who it was.

Before Mudd made his ruling, he invited comments from prosecutor Jeff Dusek, who managed only a wry remark.

"My inclination is to comment, but on advice of counsel, I I will submit," Dusek said, gesturing to his fellow prosecutor, Woody Clarke.

Defense attorney Robert Boyce told Mudd he was concerned about the integrity of proceedings. "They broadcast it, they knew what they were doing," Boyce said.

He called it "just another effort to sensationalize these proceedings."

Mudd told the media attorneys he welcomed the opportunity to make a "full and complete record" of his decision to eject Stillwood.

In his comments, Mudd made it clear he was still angry with KFMB television's decision to include a high school yearbook photo of Neal Westerfield during a telecast of the son of the defendant's testimony. Mudd had ordered that no television or print images of the adult, who is now 19, be transmitted.

The judge's inclination was to ban both the station's radio and TV representatives from the trial.

"Frankly, they seem to be the two networks in this community that just don't seem to get it," he said.

However, after his wife advised him to "sleep in it, " he gave the matter "serious thought," Mudd said.

He quoted a line from a Supreme Court decision in 1976 involving a press restraint issue in Nebraska.

" The extraordinary protections afforded by the First Amendment carry with them something in the nature of a fiduciary duty to exercise the protected rights responsibly--a duty widely acknowledged but not always observed by editors and publishers," Mudd said. "It is not asking too much to suggest that those who exercise First Amendment rights in newspapers or broadcasting enterprises direct some effort to protect the rights of an accused to a fair trial by unbiased jurors. "

Mudd said he was troubled by the host's decision to broadcast the information, knowing it was from a closed hearing.

The judge wasn't impressed by the host's justification that the general public was already aware of the issue, and that Stillwood was ignorant of the source.

He said the host wasn't conducting a search for the truth, but a grab for ratings. He also took the opportunity to lash out at "idiots from LA talk stations," who broadcast an afternoon program from a media compound outside the County courthouse. He said the members of the talk station were "acting like teen-agers" in front of the courthouse.

The judge acknowledged he could not control such behavior but could control his own courtroom.

The judge said officials from KFMB must be taking "great glee in shoving it in this court's face."

Fred D'Ambrosi, news director for KFMB-TV and Radio, said his television station showed only a high school yearbook photo of Westerfield's son.

"We didn't shoot him in court, which was the judge's order," D'Ambrosi said.

Regarding River Stillwood, D'Ambrosi said the issue was important because of the First Amendment and a free press. He added that he was not in charge of the Rick Roberts program.

"We're just trying to report the news and uphold the First Amendment," D'Ambrosi said. "If (Mudd) can ban River Stillwood, he can ban anybody." The news director suggested that the judge was angry because he didn't like the story that was reported.

D'Ambrosi said he had never spoken to Mudd, and called his reading of the situation "totally inaccurate."

Mudd said he had done a 180-degree turnaround on the issue of allowing cameras and reporters in the courtroom since deciding to allow Court TV to cover the trial live.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 981-991 next last
Comment #241 Removed by Moderator

To: Doc Savage
Any verdict of guilty, in my opinion, will be the result of a generalized hysteria sweeping this country involving child abductions and child pornography. That is not to say that we as parents shouldn't be concerned about the welfare of our progeny, but when someone's life is on the line, we should exercise our best judgment and and make every effort to force the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Very well said.

242 posted on 08/14/2002 12:04:24 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
LOL..you bad boy...hehehe
243 posted on 08/14/2002 12:05:13 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
LOL - too funny.
244 posted on 08/14/2002 12:05:14 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: alexandria; Doc Savage
ditto!
245 posted on 08/14/2002 12:05:38 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
ROFL!!
246 posted on 08/14/2002 12:06:54 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: SilentWitness
Oh thank you! Thank you! For going for a "drive by"
for us! Glad you're back with us, too.

Was DW's front door really full open?

Well, I think Dusek certainly should have proved all the
porn, questionable or otherwise. If the jury finds him
guilty on the porn, it's no big deal. Can probably get
off with "time already served." Perhaps a small fine.

Actually, I think there was way too much emphasis placed
on the porn. It's my recollection some of it hadn't been
accessed for 3 years.
247 posted on 08/14/2002 12:07:03 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
hen prosecutors played the rape movies during the trial, several jurors burst into tears.

Wow.

248 posted on 08/14/2002 12:07:19 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
The little blue pill goes with the 180 Frankfurter. You're not good at taking food orders. Maybe go back to wait school at Dad's?
249 posted on 08/14/2002 12:08:06 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Oh, give it up. They were alternate jurors, and aren't even deliberating. Amazing how this emotional BS just makes the lynch mob drool more...
250 posted on 08/14/2002 12:09:42 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
No regular juror cried. A couple of the ALTERNATE jurors did.
251 posted on 08/14/2002 12:10:59 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
You are right PoliticalMom.
252 posted on 08/14/2002 12:11:24 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

Comment #253 Removed by Moderator

To: VRWC_minion
"several jurors burst into tears."

All those who "burst into tears" were 2 of the alternate jurors."

So said even Court TV reporter.

254 posted on 08/14/2002 12:12:36 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: All
THE BLOOD EVIDENCE

I'm so tired of hereing about the BLOOD evidence all over TV.

THERE IS NO BLOOD EVIDENCE!

The testimony is:

A. Stains that look like blood where found, but there are no clear photo's.

B. The stains were tested by "presumptive tests" that also react to RUST, DROOL, AND HORSERADISH.

C. No test for HUMAN BLOOD WAS DONE! No Precipitin test was done. No Serology tests were done, period.

THERE IS NO BLOOD EVIDENCE IN EVIDENCE!

255 posted on 08/14/2002 12:13:33 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
Hey..........I resent that remark.
256 posted on 08/14/2002 12:13:56 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
One late request? Do you have any Jackal on the menu?
257 posted on 08/14/2002 12:14:45 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
ROTFLMAO
258 posted on 08/14/2002 12:15:03 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
But the media already has him drawn & quartered.--They eviscerate him daily!!

Think also about this.

The MEDIA all said CLINTON was the BEST PRESIDENT, That he WASN'T LYING. That He was a SAINT.

The MEDIA said GW is an IDIOT.

So, WHENEVER YOU WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH, GO WITH THE OPPOSITE of WHAT the MEDIA SAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!

259 posted on 08/14/2002 12:17:25 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
LOL!!! 180 Frankfurter...and a bowl of water. BWAAAAHAHAHA I'll be giggling about this all day. Brilliant!
260 posted on 08/14/2002 12:17:51 PM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 981-991 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson