Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Jurors ask to hear recorded Westerfield interview

Judge Mudd lashes out at talk radio 'idiots,'
bars KFMB radio producer from courtroom

SIGNONSANDIEGO STAFF
and WIRE SERVICES

August 13, 2002A San Diego jury spent a brief second day deliberating August 9, 2002 in the trial of David Westerfield, man accused of kidnapping and murdering 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, before breaking for the weekend without reaching a verdict in the closely watched case. Judge William D. Mudd goes over the jury verdict form with jurors before sending them into deliberations in the trial at the San Diego courthouse on August 8.  (Dan Trevan/San Diego Herald Tribune via Reuters)

The fourth day of deliberations in the David Westerfield trial has ended with no conclusion by the jury. The jury will resume deliberations Wednesday morning at the San Diego County Courthouse. Earleir today, jurors asked to hear Westerfield's only recorded explanation of what he was doing the weekend 7-year-old Danielle van Dam was kidnapped.

Superior Court Judge William Mudd said he was granting a request from the jury for a tape recording and transcript of the taped interview Westerfield gave to police interrogation specialist Paul Redden on Feb. 4, two days after Danielle's disappearance.

During the interview, Westerfield makes a reference to "we" as he describes his meandering trip through San Diego and Imperial counties on Feb. 2 and Feb. 3.

"The little place we, we were at was just a little small turnoff-type place," Westerfield said.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of murder, kidnapping and a special circumstance allegation that the killing of Danielle van Dam occurred during the commission of kidnapping.

He is also accused of the misdemeanor possession of child pornography.

Jurors are in their fourth day of deliberations.

Mudd's disclosure came during a 10 a.m. open hearing on a request from KFMB-AM 760 to let River Stillwood, an assistant radio producer for talk show host Rick Roberts, back into the courtroom to cover the trial.

"She's out and will remain out and will not be permitted in for any live proceedings... because she is the representative of an individual who takes great glee and delight shoving it in this court's face," Mudd said.

Mudd ejected Stillwood from the courtroom on Thursday after asking her to tell him who told Roberts about the details of a Wednesday exchange between Mudd and the attorneys in the case during a sealed hearing.

Stillwood told Mudd that she didn't know who gave Roberts the information. On the air, Roberts later said he had received a call from a source in the courthouse.

The court is conducting an internal investigation, but cannot compel Roberts and Stillwood to name their source, Mudd said.

Stillwood can still sit in the pressroom and watch the video feed of any court activity, Mudd said.

KFMB was welcome to send someone else to sit in the courtroom, so long as the person was representing the radio station and not Roberts, he said.

KFMB's attorney Joann Rezzo argued that the disclosure did not violate the defendant's right to a fair trial. She also argued that Stillwood didn't give him "the source of the leak" because she didn't know who it was.

Before Mudd made his ruling, he invited comments from prosecutor Jeff Dusek, who managed only a wry remark.

"My inclination is to comment, but on advice of counsel, I I will submit," Dusek said, gesturing to his fellow prosecutor, Woody Clarke.

Defense attorney Robert Boyce told Mudd he was concerned about the integrity of proceedings. "They broadcast it, they knew what they were doing," Boyce said.

He called it "just another effort to sensationalize these proceedings."

Mudd told the media attorneys he welcomed the opportunity to make a "full and complete record" of his decision to eject Stillwood.

In his comments, Mudd made it clear he was still angry with KFMB television's decision to include a high school yearbook photo of Neal Westerfield during a telecast of the son of the defendant's testimony. Mudd had ordered that no television or print images of the adult, who is now 19, be transmitted.

The judge's inclination was to ban both the station's radio and TV representatives from the trial.

"Frankly, they seem to be the two networks in this community that just don't seem to get it," he said.

However, after his wife advised him to "sleep in it, " he gave the matter "serious thought," Mudd said.

He quoted a line from a Supreme Court decision in 1976 involving a press restraint issue in Nebraska.

" The extraordinary protections afforded by the First Amendment carry with them something in the nature of a fiduciary duty to exercise the protected rights responsibly--a duty widely acknowledged but not always observed by editors and publishers," Mudd said. "It is not asking too much to suggest that those who exercise First Amendment rights in newspapers or broadcasting enterprises direct some effort to protect the rights of an accused to a fair trial by unbiased jurors. "

Mudd said he was troubled by the host's decision to broadcast the information, knowing it was from a closed hearing.

The judge wasn't impressed by the host's justification that the general public was already aware of the issue, and that Stillwood was ignorant of the source.

He said the host wasn't conducting a search for the truth, but a grab for ratings. He also took the opportunity to lash out at "idiots from LA talk stations," who broadcast an afternoon program from a media compound outside the County courthouse. He said the members of the talk station were "acting like teen-agers" in front of the courthouse.

The judge acknowledged he could not control such behavior but could control his own courtroom.

The judge said officials from KFMB must be taking "great glee in shoving it in this court's face."

Fred D'Ambrosi, news director for KFMB-TV and Radio, said his television station showed only a high school yearbook photo of Westerfield's son.

"We didn't shoot him in court, which was the judge's order," D'Ambrosi said.

Regarding River Stillwood, D'Ambrosi said the issue was important because of the First Amendment and a free press. He added that he was not in charge of the Rick Roberts program.

"We're just trying to report the news and uphold the First Amendment," D'Ambrosi said. "If (Mudd) can ban River Stillwood, he can ban anybody." The news director suggested that the judge was angry because he didn't like the story that was reported.

D'Ambrosi said he had never spoken to Mudd, and called his reading of the situation "totally inaccurate."

Mudd said he had done a 180-degree turnaround on the issue of allowing cameras and reporters in the courtroom since deciding to allow Court TV to cover the trial live.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 981-991 next last
To: dread78645
It's ZULU time!!!
201 posted on 08/14/2002 10:47:55 AM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Amen
202 posted on 08/14/2002 10:48:16 AM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; small_l_libertarian
The witness defined surfing, and indicated they knew what porn surfing meant. Why didn't they just s p e l l it o u t..meaning, why didn't they say someone surfed rather than saying Viewed. The reader is left with the impression that all the defense is doing is "insinuating" that someone "may have" porn surfed. They DID confirm someone looked at email around 7pm that night. But not at 5pm. See what I am saying?
203 posted on 08/14/2002 10:48:45 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
ROFL!
204 posted on 08/14/2002 10:48:48 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: the-gooroo
Maybe Andy worked out a trade with Damon for Denise. :-P
205 posted on 08/14/2002 10:49:00 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
Ya think? They come across as quite "self-involved" (wink wink).
206 posted on 08/14/2002 10:51:02 AM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
Also, all of the computer "experts" in this case used the words "downloaded," "accessed," and "viewed" pretty much interchangeably.

In the strictest sense, every single thing you access that resides outside of your computer is "downloaded," as a copy of whatever it is, is moved to your computer to be displayed for you. That's what those "Temporary Internet Files" directories are for.

When normal people are talking about "downloading," though, we generally mean things like programs or collections, where you actually request the item, then wait for a full copy of it to be transferred to your computer.

You don't have to knowingly "download" something in that sense for a copy of it to be on your computer.
207 posted on 08/14/2002 10:52:31 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: fellowpatriot
Eew..that's a good point. Try the dept of justice website...it's gotta be safer. :)

http://fjsrc.urban.org

http://search.usdoj.gov/compass?scope=pedophiles&ui=sr&view-template=dojsimple


http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/
208 posted on 08/14/2002 10:53:30 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Doesn't matter. Neal said he wasn't looking at porn at that time. SOMEBODY did look at porn at that time, either on the internet, or inside the computer itself.

So, either Neal lied, or the police were searching DW's computer without a warrant. I don't care which of those explanations you choose, but those are the only two possible explanations.
209 posted on 08/14/2002 10:56:27 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Kerensky
Remember...Damon used the steam cleaner because of urine on the carpet. They blamed it on the dog! No way. It was from Westerfield, right?
210 posted on 08/14/2002 10:57:26 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Denise stated that she closed the side/garage door. Brenda said she saw Denise close it.

Denise also said she never saw Damon come down-stairs.
Then later she said Damon is eating pizza with the gang.

None of the pizza party crowd has any crediblity IMO.

UNINVITED- well everyone is invited when you live in a bedroom community-- As Brenda stated on National TV-- I heard her myself. Brenda said well "We live in a bedroom community here".

Well, that's one way of putting it ! LOL

211 posted on 08/14/2002 10:58:51 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Oh, I forgot, stress over his upcoming 50th birthday.
212 posted on 08/14/2002 11:00:46 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
LOL
213 posted on 08/14/2002 11:02:26 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
"They blamed it on the dog! No way. It was from Westerfield, right?

LOL! But of course! It had to be! After a night of drinking & hiding in that closet for over three hours(?), he had to "go!"

214 posted on 08/14/2002 11:16:45 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
I would have to reread that comment from neal. Do you by chance have a quote from him?
Maybe I can look later. Thanks....


Now, I know this all started cuz of congressman billy bob...but have completely forgotten the reason we were searching in the first place. It must be an age thing. :D
215 posted on 08/14/2002 11:17:16 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

Comment #216 Removed by Moderator

To: NatureGirl
It's ZULU time!!!

I maybe wrong, but I don't remember any testimony about the box being on UTC.

But assuming it was, where was DAW at 08:47 ?

217 posted on 08/14/2002 11:22:47 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
They probably have a hard time getting past 'self' in many areas of their thinking.

DW had a real life, he didn't need this crap. I still think he went on a cleaning spree as a way of washing that woman right out of his life.

He was wandering around looking for new places to play that didn't have baggage of old memories.

makes a lot more sense than becoming a stealth ninja child molester in his old age.
218 posted on 08/14/2002 11:29:08 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Do you mean where he says it wasn't him looking at the porn at 4:47? I believe that's in his testimony. If that's not what you mean, could you please be more specific?
219 posted on 08/14/2002 11:29:27 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
I'm gonna be all emotional here and stuff - looking at DW while Susan L was on the stand, it's obvious that losing her messed him up. He still loves her (and I'm pretty sure she still loves him). I agree that he was trying to do stuff to help him forget.
220 posted on 08/14/2002 11:31:55 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 981-991 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson