[UCANSEE2]

Wow! I didn't realize the sparkles outfit is missing!! I assumed it is still in her closet.

My earlier post was a hypothetical discussion by police.

THe TRUTH is that it was not STATED whether the outfit was there or not. We don't know if the police even ASKED about the outfit or it's whereabouts.

We only know Brenda SAID she bought it that day, that there were SPARKLES from it on the floor, and that the VD's said Danielle was wearing her PJ's, but there were PJ's laying there on the floor. Damon stated Danielle had the covers pulled up so he couldn't see if she had on her PJ's, then later he claimed she did. LIAR, LIAR, all of them.

[Rheo]

Dangit, you rumor starter!!..ya had us all thinking we missed an entire testimony or something. :-)

[the Deejay]

Yes, they are such liars. I hate liars. One can never
get truth or actual facts from liars. Hence, the jury
should toss out all of their testimony. Denise's as well.

[the-gooroo]

Thanks UCS for clearing that up. Whew! OK, there was NO testimony that the sparkle blouse was missing. Get it - got it - good!

[dread78645]

>Wow! I didn't realize the sparkles outfit is missing!! I assumed it is still in her closet.

My earlier post was a hypothetical discussion by police.

If true, rather than hypothetical, it would explain why PDvD got upset with momma van Dam showing off the "identical" pair of PJ's to the press.

They were Danielle's!