To: UCANSEE2
"We have more evidence the JUDGE in this case is CORRUPT intentionally, or AN IDIOT."
Hell's bells, I've known that all along about Mudd.
To: the Deejay
The following scenario appears to me representative of the entire proceedings:
During cross-examimation of prosecution witness.
FELDMAN: Did you do such and such?
PROSECUTION WITNESS: No.
FELDMAN: Why not?
DUSEK: Objection...Argumentative.
MUDD: Sustained...Do not answer.
During cross-examination of defense witness.
DUSEK: Did you do such and such?
DEFENSE WITNESS: No.
DUSEK: Why not?
FELDMAN: Objection...Argumentative.
MUDD: Overruled...Answer the question.
I also often detected what appeared to be contempt in Mudd's voice as he either overruled Feldman or sustained Dusek. This would not come out in written transcripts.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson