To: small_l_libertarian
For those that want to "split hairs" the statement
of "I was never invited" means so much. In fact,
so much so, they'd give DW the death penalty for
such statment.
On the other had, the slip ups the vdams made, which
were more damaging, are skipped over. Ever notice
that?
To: the Deejay
I know - these folks that are so anxious to send a man to his death on almost no evidence scare me.
To: All
I don't know if I can stomach listening to court TV, have they all had lobotomies before being hired or does that come afterwards?
Right to fair trial preempts right to free press in my book and broadcasting what went on in a closed door session IMO violates the gag order and someone needs to be spanked for that. I can't wait for RR to be jailed for contempt for refusing to give up his source. LOL I think he went over the line this time.
If court TV could report things right like the underwear, steam cleaning, bleach smell etc they might have some credibility, but in my book they have shot themselves in the thigh. (yes a little closer to home than the foot)
To: the Deejay
Since I have not had CTV for very long, today was my first day to hear the taped audio interview. To me DW sounded like he had nothing to hide and rather pleasant. On another issue, if neighborhood homes were checked Saturday, how did DW KNOW the VDs were not going to check on Danielle that Friday evening? The house to house check could have begun that Friday night (had they checked on their kids and called LE), and if we believe the prosecution Danielle was in his home at that time (and later somehow he got the MH and then got her into the MH without anyone knowing). Someone please correct me if I have my facts wrong, but isn't that what the prosecution wants us to believe? Waaaay too many questions for me (not to mention he couldn't have dumped her body either).
550 posted on
08/13/2002 3:09:11 PM PDT by
Lanza
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson