[rolling_stone]

Yes if I had done such a terrible thing I would have burned the clothes and disposed of the ashes by scattering them in the wind or ocean in different places. If I had a spot of blood on my carpet, I also wouldn't put a towel over it (cut it out and destroy it)..or was that towel supposed to show how DW didn't see it?

Maybe burning the evidence was supposed to happen when the first "false" reports of DW having a huge fire out in the desert. Amazing, most of what DW told the PD was true, much of the rest can be because of faulty memory. I know if I was asked everything I did on long trip like that after drinking too much on friday nite, I doubt I could give completely correct answers.

Maybe DW is guilty and maybe he isn't, I doubt we will really ever know and I would hate to be on that jury especially with all the talking heads spewing nonsense on TV.

A lot of unanswered questions here IMO.

[UCANSEE2]

PING ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

NEWEST GOLDEN COMMENTS

the state did not come anywhere close to proving that he did.

I think the State's case stops at the van Dam's door. They have not presented a shred of anything that places DW in the home or an indication that he abducted Danielle. Kidnapping must be proven or murder can't be. Has kidnapping been proven?

IMO, Jeff Dusek suggesting that we just have to believe that he got into the house undetected and got her out of the house somehow is asking way too much. It is the key to everything they claim happened subsequently and the key doesn't fit the lock.
by Southflanknorthpawsis

The bugs have more credibility than most of the witnesses in this case.
by tunneldiver

Dusek's theory used a lot of 'missing' evidence.
There was the blood all over the 'missing boots'.
There was the blood all over the 'missing comforter'
There was the 'missing blue blanket' that Danielle was wrapped in to keep the bugs from getting to her.
There was the 'missing orange UFO' that left orange fibers all over DW's house and Danielle's body.
There was the 'missing blue/grey UFO' that left blue/grey fibers on Danielle's body and in DW's MH.
There was a missing breifcase with that had a million dollars in it, that police still refuse to return to me.
There is the 'missing' NASA Spacesuit that DW used to enter the VD home.
Seriously, Prosecution/LE's theorized all kinds of things and then searched for the evidence to prove it. Apparently, when they couldn't find the evidence they needed, they either faked it, or declared it missing.
by UCANSEE2

Those dry cleaning reciepts have 3 different times on them and the computer was up and down. Maybe DW only went once, and maybe he wasn't naked, and maybe the clerk has the mind of a potato chip.
by John Jamieson

[Rheo]

A smart lady asked a good question...

Why would that detective search for days for the drycleaning place if DW had already told them about it?

Did it give Ott some time at the cleaners?

[Marysecretary]

I feel that way, too. I'm uneasy about all of this "evidence." He may well have done it, but I hope they aren't just "closing the case," and not being open to other possibilities.