Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jamieson
That's the part I have the most trouble with. Duesk never proved Kidnapping and went as far as saying he didn't have to prove how he (DW) did it. If you were on a jury, wouldn't you want them to tell you how the crime was commited?
91 posted on 08/10/2002 1:34:54 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Krodg
Only in America!

Maybe the jury is smarter than we think.
95 posted on 08/10/2002 1:38:22 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Krodg
Dosuk DOES charge DW with kidnapping and murder. Admits that he can't prove it. Doesn't have the foggiest idea why he would do it. Doesn't know how he did it.
He DOESN'T charge the man with rape or even molestation but DOES
tell them exactly how he commits a brutal rape in the motorhome. I still can't figure out how Dusek got away with that. ?????




103 posted on 08/10/2002 2:06:41 PM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Krodg
That's the part I have the most trouble with. Duesk never proved Kidnapping and went as far as saying he didn't have to prove how he (DW) did it. If you were on a jury, wouldn't you want them to tell you how the crime was commited?

The exact reason why I doubt Westerfield killed Danielle. I sure hope they find who did.

245 posted on 08/10/2002 7:47:49 PM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson