To: John Jamieson
That's the part I have the most trouble with. Duesk never proved Kidnapping and went as far as saying he didn't have to prove how he (DW) did it. If you were on a jury, wouldn't you want them to tell you how the crime was commited?
91 posted on
08/10/2002 1:34:54 PM PDT by
Krodg
To: Krodg
Only in America!
Maybe the jury is smarter than we think.
To: Krodg
Dosuk DOES charge DW with kidnapping and murder. Admits that he can't prove it. Doesn't have the foggiest idea why he would do it. Doesn't know how he did it.
He DOESN'T charge the man with rape or even molestation but DOES
tell them exactly how he commits a brutal rape in the motorhome. I still can't figure out how Dusek got away with that. ?????
To: Krodg
That's the part I have the most trouble with. Duesk never proved Kidnapping and went as far as saying he didn't have to prove how he (DW) did it. If you were on a jury, wouldn't you want them to tell you how the crime was commited?The exact reason why I doubt Westerfield killed Danielle. I sure hope they find who did.
245 posted on
08/10/2002 7:47:49 PM PDT by
mafree
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson