[small_l_libertarian]

Right, that's what's bugging me. As best I can see, no one has shown that the jacket is DW's. There's a receipt for a "sport jacket," a girl who can't remember what it looked like, then a cop who says that's the jacket he took from the drycleaners. The chain of custody starts with the drycleaner, not with DW. (Not sure I'm explaining this well - sorry if I'm being confusing.)

[small_l_libertarian]

Need to clarify...I'm not saying the jacket is not DW's jacket. Just that there is no way for us to know that it is his from the testimony, and no way for us to know that it isn't his without DW testifying.