[pinz-n-needlez]

I agree.

Last night, someone lamented that people aren't willing to pay attention to the defense's arguments.

All you really need to do is to try to follow the prosecutions arguments. It is impossible to move from step to step. Even Dusek knows that, when he whined that he didn't HAVE to prove how DW did any of if, I about split a gut. That's the best statement made in that courtroom on behalf of DW.

[small_l_libertarian]

Lots of things are clicking for me right now - there are so many things Feldman couldn't use without subjecting DW to Dusek BANG-BANG-BANGING on the jury box railing during his cross-exam. Orange fibers in the SUV - Brenda. Can't claim it without DW, 'cuz it's he said-she said. Drycleaning items - can't say they're not necessarily DW's, because who could testify to that except for him? Same for the kiddie porn - Dusek ended up calling Neal (who I am certain lied about the anime/hentai porn) and then claiming during close that DW and Feldman were "trying to pin it on Neal." And Dusek doesn't have to PROVE anything. Ugh. Between that and his totally-screwed-up instructions to the jury, it was just awful. I hope the jury has some thinkers on it.