To: pinz-n-needlez
I agree- Danielle not kidnapped out of her house that night..
So many pieces about this case seem so odd. Here's another odd piece from my perspective. Although I have no experience in LE, this senario seems strange to me...
That Sat. morning that Danielle was found missing, LE arrive. LE stay all day Saturday, LE still there at 3:00AM Sun. morning, when forensics were taking finger prints, blood evidence, etc. Someone calls Det.Thomsovic out to the VD's. Now, Det. Thomsovic states he arrives with Ernie Hebert=LE child abuse expert. One of the things they look for is blood evidence. Yet, blood evidence was found on the cuff of Danielle's PJ's. This blood evidence wasn't reported to Det. Thomsovic or Hebert.
Also, Thomsovic stated that he went out to the VD's at 3:00AM Sun. morning to locate Danielle. He was asked: Why did you go out there, to locate Danielle. He said: "well I wasn't told that she was not there." This is really ODD to me, the child at that time had been missing for many hours, LE were all over the VD house. Danielle was not in her house at 3:00AM Sun Morn. Yet, Det. Thomsovic goes over there to find her???? He was not told that she was not there=implies that she might still be in the house???? STRANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
371 posted on
08/11/2002 10:45:11 AM PDT by
juzcuz
To: juzcuz
WAs that the testimony about taking the dogs through the house to look for her? That made no sense to me.
Sounds like VDs had help beyond the pr people in constructing a story. But it doesn't sound like that story was decided on until sometime last Saturday afternoon.
Please keep reading up and sharing your toughts on this.
Will the gag order be lifted after a guilty or acquited verdict? What about after a hung jury is announced? Anyone, anyone?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson