To: rolling_stone
RS - I just went back and re-read the whole thing. I agree - she never did say what the darned things looked like. Obviously a bad assumption on my part. Sorry.
To: small_l_libertarian
Now something's bothering me, and if I'm reaching, you guys please tell me so. I was under the impression that Julie Mills eventually identified the green jacket and floral/striped bedding.
Dusek didn't pull that stuff out in court and ask her to confirm that those were the items that DW brought in. He did, however, pull them out with the cop (Torgerson?) on the stand and have him identify them as the items he took into custody.
Wouldn't it have been more important to confirm that the chain of possession of the items started with DW, not with the drycleaners? I know what I'm trying to say, but maybe it's not coming out right. Why weren't the drycleaners asked to identify the items instead of the police?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson