Hey, with such a perfectly reasonable explaination as that re the most important piece of evidence in the case, there is no room for reasonable doubt, is there?
The same people who thought it was highly unusual for DW to take his clothes to dry cleaners on 2/4 are now having to claim that he did the same thing the week before. Interesting.
The same people who thought it was highly unusual for DW to take his clothes to dry cleaners on 2/4 are now having to claim that he did the same thing the week before.It was established during testimony that DW was a frequent customer of the drycleaners. That is why the clerk was able to testify to his usual demeanor. He had also never arrived in his MH before.
The unusual thing for 2/4 was the arrival first thing in MH and demeanor and then concealing that visit from police. Then going in a second time with his Friday night Dad's clothes and asking for same-day service.
Fact is, the 1/26 receipt was thrown in during argument as a red herring.