To: shezza
This jacket is the smoking gun. Danielle's blood is on that jacket. And after hearing all of the closing arguments, this wasn't touched at all. Give me an explanation of how it got there. YOu didn't hear one, not one. THe attack was that there were no photographs, except for maybe a Polaroid. Danielle's blood on his jacket. No dispute, no defense evidence that it was not her blood. THe smoking gun. THere is no explanation except that he did it.
299 posted on
08/08/2002 9:52:51 AM PDT by
shezza
To: shezza
Look at all the individual things that he did that were stupid, that were guilty. All those factors have been established by his own words and by all the people that saw him. We have his lies. Lies are a circumstance of guilt. Destroying evidence is a circumstance of guilt. Going to drycleaners, taking jacket...with her blood...
The hair, the prints, the fibers, the carpet, the variety of locations. How many places did we find them?
303 posted on
08/08/2002 9:55:17 AM PDT by
shezza
To: shezza
"
There is no explanation, except that he did it".
You're right, Dusek, there IS no explanation...so he didn't do it.
sw
304 posted on
08/08/2002 9:55:26 AM PDT by
spectre
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson