[UCANSEE2]

What overwhelming evidence do you mean?

All of the evidence and testimony has been discussed and it's meaning and probability for accuracy determined.

Lawyers are conducting CLOSING ARGUMENTS, in which no cross examination is allowed. THis means they are giving totally one-sided arguments. Are you listening to closing arguments? Have you listened to both sides?

Do you think DW is guilty?

Do you think the jury will find him guilty?

Did the cadaver dogs hit on the Motorhome?

Were the two small spots (one in the MH on the carpet, one on DW's jacket) tested and proved to be BLOOD?

What were the results of the DNA test on those spots? What kind of test was done on the hair found in the MH? What does that test prove?

[Jaded]

The last person I asked in here today to explain in a reasonable manner how David did this left... without reply. Surprised me, I tell you!!

[contessa machiaveli]

i really believe westerfield is guilty and the jury will as well. the absolute clincher for me is the indisputable fact that danielle's blood was found on the right hand side shoulder of westerfields' jacket. i haven't allowed my emotions to cloud my opinion...it's the facts m'am. and BTW, i hardly approve of the van damme's lifestyle but at most they were negligent and they'll feel guilty for that as long as they live. BUT, westerfield did murder the child...and he must pay.