[bvw]

Van Sustern at least seemed to pause, perhaps considering that this may be a railroading. She said that when she had clients on trial she would advise them to keep a constant almost emotionless face, like Westerfield had done. The other legal commentators -- a man who represents shoplifters, and two others were running on as to how Westerfield's emotionless face was weird and off-putting. She asked about the defense's treatment of the blood-stain on the jacket and the correspondent chick at the trial discounted all the defense's claims against it as nothing. Van Sustern seemed to check herself in a counter comment to that too-easy dismissal by the chick on site.

[Jaded]

What are they talking about? David Westerfield shows emotion. Just not the histronics of the Bren.

[Lucky]

None of the defense lawyer experts on TV ever say the DNA on the jacket could have gotten on there at another time when the MH was left unlocked in the neighborhood and the dry cleaners who always looks for stains never saw it. The hot shot experts don't know the case like we do. They sit silent when the stain is brought up.